A New Treatment Strategy for Spinal Metastasis: The “Systemic Conditions, Effectiveness of Systemic Treatment, Neurology, and Oncology” Decision Framework System

Author:

Cao Xuyong12,Jiang Weihao12,Zhang Bin1,Zhao Xiongwei23,Yu Haikuan14,Lei Mingxing564,Cao Yuncen2,Su Xiuyun7,Liu Yaosheng1236

Affiliation:

1. Senior Department of Orthopedics, The Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China;

2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China;

3. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Fifth School of Clinical Medicine, Anhui Medical University, Anhui, China;

4. Chinese PLA Medical School, Beijing, China;

5. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hainan Hospital of PLA General Hospital, Hainan, China;

6. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Clinical Research Center for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine & Rehabilitation, PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China;

7. Intelligent Medical Innovation Institute, Southern University of Science and Technology Hospital, Shenzhen, China

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Treating metastatic spinal tumors poses a significant challenge because there are currently no universally applied guidelines for managing spinal metastases. This study aims to propose a new decision framework for the 12-point epidural spinal cord compression grading system to treat patients with metastatic spinal tumors and investigate its clinical effectiveness in a multicenter analysis. METHODS: This study analyzed 940 patients with metastatic spinal tumors between December 2017 and March 2023. The study provided the clinical evidence for the systemic conditions, effectiveness of systemic treatment, neurology, and oncology (SENO) decision framework among spine metastases. The SENO decision framework was launched in January 2021 in our hospitals, classifying patients into 2 groups: The non-SENO group (n = 489) consisted of patients treated between December 2017 and January 2021, while the SENO group (n = 451) comprised patients treated from January 2021 to March 2023. RESULTS: Patients in the SENO group were more likely to receive minimally invasive surgery (67.85% vs 58.69%) and less chance of receiving spinal cord circular decompression surgery (14.41% vs 24.74%) than patients in the non-SENO group (P < .001). Furthermore, patients in the SENO group experienced fewer perioperative complications (9.09% vs 15.34%, P = .004), incurred lower hospitalization costs (P < .001), had shorter length of hospitalization (P < .001), and received systematic treatments for tumors earlier (P < .001). As a result, patients in the SENO group (329.00 [95% CI: 292.06-365.94] days) demonstrated significantly improved survival outcomes compared with those in the non-SENO group (279.00 [95% CI: 256.91-301.09], days) (P < .001). At 3 months postdischarge, patients in the SENO group reported greater improvements in their quality of life, encompassing physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being, when compared with patients in the non-SENO group. CONCLUSION: The SENO decision framework is a promising approach for treating patients with metastatic spinal tumors.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3