Biomechanical Analysis of 2 Versus 4 Rods Across the Cervicothoracic Junction in a Human Cadaveric Model

Author:

Pivazyan Gnel12ORCID,Winters Carlynn G.3,Brooks Daina M.24,Sandhu Faheem A.1,Cunningham Bryan W.24

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurosurgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA;

2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Musculoskeletal Research Center, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA;

3. Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia, USA;

4. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Posterior reconstruction of the cervicothoracic junction poses significant biomechanical challenges secondary to transition from the mobile cervical to rigid thoracic spines and change in alignment from lordosis to kyphosis. After destabilization, the objectives of the current investigation were to compare the rod strain and multidirectional flexibility properties of the cervicothoracic junction using a 4-rod vs traditional 2-rod reconstructions. METHODS: Ten human cadaveric cervicothoracic specimens underwent multidirectional flexibility testing including flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. After intact analysis, specimens were destabilized from C4 to T3 and instrumented from C3 to T4. The following reconstructions were tested: (1) 3.5-mm titanium (Ti) 2-rod, (2) 3.5-mm Ti 4-rod, (3) 4.0-mm cobalt chrome (CoCr) 2-rod, (4) 4.0-mm CoCr 4-rod, and (5) Ti 3.5- to 5.5-mm tapered rod reconstructions. The operative level range of motion and rod strain of the primary and accessory rods were quantified. RESULTS: The addition of accessory rods to a traditional 2-rod construct improved the biomechanical stability of the reconstructions in all three loading modalities for Ti (P < .05). The accessory CoCr rods improved stability in flexion-extension and axial rotation (P < .05). The addition of accessory rods in Ti or CoCr reconstructions did not significantly reduce rod strain (P < .05). CoCr 2 and 4 rods exhibited less strain than both Ti 2 and 4 rods. CONCLUSION: Supplemental accessory rods affixed to traditional 2-rod constructs significantly improved stability of Ti alloys and CoCr alloy materials. The 4.0-mm CoCr rods provided greater stability than 3.5-mm Ti rods in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. While rod strain was not significantly reduced by the addition of accessory rods, it was reduced in CoCr rod treatment groups compared with the Ti rods.

Funder

Stryker

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3