Trends in Online Patient Perspectives of Neurosurgeons: A Sentiment Analysis

Author:

Quinones Addison1ORCID,Tang Justin E.2,Vasan Vikram1,Li Troy1,Schupper Alexander J.1,Ali Muhammad1,White Christopher A.2,Hannah Theodore C.1,Asfaw Zerubabbel1,Li Adam Y.1,Durbin John1,Arvind Varun2,Kim Jun S.2,Choudhri Tanvir F.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA;

2. Department of Orthopedics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients increasingly rely on readily available physician reviews to inform their provider choices. Sentiment analysis and machine learning techniques quantitatively analyze written prose to understand patient desires from physician encounters. Patient perspectives on their medical care have been understudied in neurosurgery. OBJECTIVE: To analyze patient reviews of neurosurgeons to uncover trends between patient ratings of their encounters and content in their reviews. METHODS: Identification of neurosurgeons and demographic data were collected from 115 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education–accredited programs using public data. Healthgrades.com was used to obtain online written and star rating reviews which were analyzed using a machine learning sentiment analysis package to generate a sentiment score. Student t tests compared differences between demographics and outcomes from the sentiment analysis. Multivariate regression was performed to examine associations between sentiment rating and word/word pair frequency. RESULTS: One thousand two hundred eighty-four neurosurgeons were found to have review profiles which consisted of 6815 reviews. Analysis revealed a direct correlation between sentiment score and star rating (r2 = 0.554, P < .0001). There were no differences in the sentiment score based on neurosurgeons' sex; however, younger surgeons had more positive reviews (P = .022). Word frequency analysis showed that reviews were less likely to be positive if they included “pain” (odds ratio [OR]: 0.28, CI: 0.24-0.32, P < .0001) or “rude” (OR: 0.03, CI: 0.01-0.06, P < .0001). Reviews were more likely to be positive when they included “kind” (OR: 3.7, CI: 2.6-5.3, P < .0001) or “pain-free” (OR: 3.1, CI: 2.1-4.7, P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Top-rated reviews demonstrate the importance of compassion in patient satisfaction. The word “pain” arose for both negative and positive reviews. Pain management seems to be a salient component of patients' evaluation of their neurosurgical care, thereby underscoring the importance of guiding patient pain expectations.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3