Abstract
This paper considers the role played by the evolution of technological conditions in the rise and fall of the rules-based system. I argue that the rules-based system was in fact endogenous to the economic and technological conditions under which it came to be: when industries are competitive, companies are covering their cost of capital, workers are being paid their marginal product, everyone is making a living, no-one is getting obscenely rich, and participation in trade is a win-win proposition. This is approximately the pre-1980s world of limited economic rents, a constant labour share of national incomes and constant returns to scale, as described by the Kaldor facts. The subsequent rise of economic rents induced strategic behaviour which is incompatible with a rules-based allocation of production. Accordingly, the economic doctrines and governance systems developed for the low-rent and low-uncertainty world of the mature industrial economy are not appropriate for today’s rent-rich and highly uncertain world of strategic behaviour and need to be fundamentally reviewed on a first principles basis.
Reference71 articles.
1. Andrenelli, Andrea and Javier Lopez Gonzalez. 2023. "Understanding the potential scope, definition and impact of the WTO e-commerce Moratorium," OECD Trade Policy Papers, No. 275, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/59ceace9-en.
2. Arrow, Kenneth J. 1962. "The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing." The Review of Economic Studies. 29, no. 3: 155–173.
3. Bagwell, Kyle, Chad P. Bown, and Robert W. Staiger. 2016. “Is the WTO Passé?” Journal of Economic Literature 54, no. 4: 1125–1231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jel.20151192
4. Baldwin, Richard. 2016. “The World Trade Organization and the Future of Multilateralism.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 30, no. 1 (Winter): 95-116.
5. Baumol, William J. 1967. “Macroeconomics of Unbalanced Growth: The Anatomy of Urban Crisis.” The American Economic Review 57, no. 3 (June): 415–426.