Comparison of Mammography, Ultrasonography, and both Combined in the Interpretation of Palpable Breast Mass

Author:

Kutrani Faiza,Elgbali Ebtisam,Geweref Nadya,Buzghei Mohamed,Beheh Ali,Soof Fatma,Elbadri Seham

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer is the most common female malignancy in worldwide and the second leading cause of female cancer death in the United States (1, 14). On average, every two  minutes a woman is diagnosed with breast cancer and one  woman will die of breast cancer every thirteen   minutes(13) In Libyan breast cancer is most  common cancer in female (17 ) Although the majority of palpable lumps are benign, a new palpable breast mass is a common presenting sign of breast cancer. the aim of the study  to reveal  the role  of USS and MG  and both in evaluating  palpable breast mass because both are available and more accurate in evaluated palpable breast  mass depend on the  aging and breast density .Materials and methods: prospective  study  between January   2018 and march   2019 In Department of Radiology in Benghazi medical center (BMC); used the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification on fifty palpable  breast masses  in two models (USS and MG ) and described each masses by selecting a single term from the Bl-RADS lexicon for description mass margin and  shape. Kappa values were calculated to assess the agreement between BIRADS assessment category and agreement between descriptions of masses margin and shape .Additionally, another reader used same USS Bl-RADS lexicon for description mass margin to assessed lnter-observer variability. Result :Regarding BIRADS assessment category, agreement  between the MG  and combined (USS and MG ) interpretations were moderate (K=0.4);agreement between USS and combined (USS and MG )  was very good (k=0.84); agreement between BIRADs category of  USS and  MG in descriptive shape of palpable breast mass was moderate (k=0.50) while for margin fair agreement (k=0.26).poor lnter-observer variability(k=0.19)  in USS Bl-RADS lexicon for description mass margin. Conclusion: USS better than MG in detected palpable breast mass so can be use   as diagnostic tool for characterized palpable breast mass.

Publisher

Medical Research Center

Reference10 articles.

1. . Linda Moy, Heller, Bailey, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria Palpable

2. Breast Masses. Journal of the American College of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine.2017;14 (55):1-22.

3. Emine devolli-disha et al. comparative accuracy of mammography and ultrasound in women with breast symptoms according to age and breast density. bosnian journal of basic medical sciences .2009; 9 (2): 132-136.

4. kobrunne, Dershaw, Schreer. Sonography .in: Diagnostic Breast Imaging.2nd edition. new York .2001.P.89-102.

5. Lehman ,Y lee, l lee. Imaging Management of Palpable Breast Abnormalities. AJR. University of Washington. November 2014;203: 1142-1153.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3