Comparison Analysis of Bore Pile Foundations and Piles to Time and Cost of Construction in Tanjung Perak Sea Keeping Base and Class II Beach Construction Project
-
Published:2023-09-15
Issue:2
Volume:8
Page:137-144
-
ISSN:2620-7222
-
Container-title:Civilla : Jurnal Teknik Sipil Universitas Islam Lamongan
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:civilla
Author:
Varian Alifiandi,Mawariza Putri Suci
Abstract
In this project using a pile foundation, but during the foundation work there were several obstacles, namely hydraulic tools that were still not ready to use, hydraulic tool repairs, and piles that were one week late, causing delays in foundation work.Therefore workers cannot work optimally while waiting for the tools to arrive. In addition to delays, there are also cost overruns where workers are still being paid for work that is not optimal, so it is necessary to compare these foundations with other foundations in order to find differences in foundations that are more efficient and minimize the problems that have occurred. From the results of data processing, it can be seen that the duration of time required for the preparatory work to the 30x30cm pile foundation with a depth of 16m for 65 points on the class 2 marine and beach guard base of Tanjung Perak is 56 days and requires a fee of IDR 655,305,366.00. For the duration of the preparatory work up to the 30cm bore pile foundation with a depth of 16m as many as 65 points on the class 2 marine and beach guard base Tanjung Perak is 59 days and requires a fee of IDR 520,779,603.00. Then the difference in time between the pile foundation and the bore pile foundation is 12 days. The pile foundation can save as much as 21.4% or 12 days of time from the bore pile foundation.
Publisher
Universitas Islam Lamongan
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference20 articles.
1. N. AL-Rousan, N. A. Mat Isa, and M. K. Mat Desa, “Efficient single and dual axis solar tracking system controllers based on adaptive neural fuzzy inference system,” J. King Saud Univ. - Eng. Sci., vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 459–469, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jksues.2020.04.004. 2. Ariany Frederika, A.A Wiranata, and Kadek Riska Larasati, “Perbandingan Biaya dan Waktu Pelaksanaan Pekerjaan Balok Struktur Beton Gedung antara Metode Konvensional dengan Precast (Studi Kasus: Grand Whiz Hotel, Gatot Subroto Barat),” J. Ilm. Tek. Sipil, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 1–8, 2014. 3. M. Muluk, D. Hamid, S. Satwarnirat, D. Dalrino, and M. Santi, “Studi Perbandingan Pondasi Tiang Pancang Dengan Pondasi Bore Pile (Studi Kasus: Pelaksanaan Pembangunan Pondasi Tower Grand Kamala Lagoon-Bekasi),” J. Tek. Sipil ITP, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 26–33, 2020, doi: 10.21063/jts.2019.v701.04. 4. H. Mousazadeh, A. Keyhani, A. Javadi, H. Mobli, K. Abrinia, and A. Sharifi, “A review of principle and sun-tracking methods for maximizing solar systems output,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 1800–1818, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2009.01.022. 5. C. E. Kusuma and F. Lestari, “Perhitungan Daya Dukung Tiang Pancang Proyek Penambahan Line Conveyor Batubara,” J. Tek. sipil, vol. 02, no. 01, pp. 1–7, 2021, [Online]. Available: http://jim.teknokrat.ac.id/index.php/tekniksipil/article/view/798
|
|