Comparison of Four Quantitative Techniques for Monitoring Microalgae Disruption by Low-Frequency Ultrasound and Acoustic Energy Efficiency-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Comparison of Four Quantitative Techniques for Monitoring Microalgae Disruption by Low-Frequency Ultrasound and Acoustic Energy Efficiency

Published:2018-02-12 Issue:5 Volume:52 Page:3295-3303
ISSN:0013-936X
Container-title:Environmental Science & Technology
language:en
Short-container-title:Environ. Sci. Technol.

Author:

Tan Xiao¹,Zhang Danfeng¹,Parajuli Keshab²,Upadhyay Sanjina³,Jiang Yuji⁴,Duan Zhipeng¹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Key Laboratory of Integrated Regulation and Resource Development on Shallow Lakes, Ministry of Education, College of Environment, Hohai University, 1 Xikang Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China

2. Origin Energy Limited, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia

3. Water Research Centre, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia

4. State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210008, China

Funder

Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China

China Scholarship Council

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Top-notch Academic Programs Project of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

Publisher

American Chemical Society (ACS)

Subject

Environmental Chemistry,General Chemistry

Link

https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.est.7b05896

Reference48 articles.

1. Microalgae for biodiesel production and other applications: A review

2. Microalgae Recovery from Water for Biofuel Production Using CO2-Switchable Crystalline Nanocellulose

3. Target Cultivation and Financing Parameters for Sustainable Production of Fuel and Feed from Microalgae

4. Disruption of microalgal cells for the extraction of lipids for biofuels: Processes and specific energy requirements

5. Evaluation and comparison of algal cell disruption methods: Microwave, waterbath, blender, ultrasonic and laser treatment

Cited by 25 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Evaluation of Cell Rupture Techniques for the Extraction of Proteins from the Microalgae Tetradesmus obliquus;Phycology;2024-01-30

2. Value-Added Chemicals from Algae: Extraction and Refining;Value Added Products From Bioalgae Based Biorefineries: Opportunities and Challenges;2024

3. Exploration of Microalgae-Activated Sludge Growth Performance in Lab-Scale Photobioreactors under Outdoor Environmental Conditions for Wastewater Biotreatment;Phycology;2023-11-17

4. Enhancement of KMnO4 treatment on cyanobacteria laden-water via 1000 kHz ultrasound at a moderate intensity;Ultrasonics Sonochemistry;2023-08

5. Exploring the impact of ultrasound on antibiotic-resistant bacteria inactivation in the sulfidated zero valent iron/persulfate system;Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering;2023-06