Affiliation:
1. Teca Training , Denmark
2. The World Bank
Abstract
Abstract
In this paper the authors develop an innovative 21 sector computable general equilibrium model of Armenia to assess the impact on Armenia of a Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Agreement (DCFTA) with the EU, as well as further regional or multilateral trade policy commitments. They find that a DCFTA with the EU will likely result in substantial gains to Armenia, but they show that the gains derive from the deep aspects of the agreement. In order of importance, the sources of the gains are: (i) trade facilitation and reduction in border costs; (ii) services liberalization; and (iii) standards harmonization. A shallow agreement with the EU that focuses only on preferential tariff liberalization in goods will likely lead to small losses to Armenia primarily due to a loss of productivity from lost varieties of technologies from the Rest of the World region in manufactured products. Additional gains can be expected in the long run from an improvement in the investment climate. The authors estimate only small gains from a services agreement with the CIS countries, but significant gains from expanding services liberalization multilaterally.
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference52 articles.
1. Baldwin, R.E., R. Forslid, and J. Haaland (1999). Investment Creation and Investment Diversion: Simulation Analysis of the Single Market Programme. In R. Baldwin and J. Francois (eds.), Dynamic Issues in Applied Commercial Policy Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Balistreri, E.J., R.H. Hillberry, and T.F. Rutherford (2010). Trade and Welfare: Does Industrial Organization Matter? Economic Letters 109: 85–87. http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolet/v109y2010i2p85-87.html
3. Balistreri, E.J., R.H. Hillberry, and T.F. Rutherford (2011). Structural Estimation and Solution of International Trade Models with Heterogeneous Firms. Journal of International Economics 83: 95–108. http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/inecon/v83y2011i2p95-108.html
4. Balistreri, E.J. and J. Markusen (2009). Sub-national Differentiation and the Role of the Firm in Optimal International Pricing. Economic Modeling 26(1): 47–62. http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecmode/v26y2009i1p47-62.html
5. Balistreri, E.J., T.F. Rutherford, and D.G. Tarr (2009). Modeling Services Liberalization: The Case of Kenya. Economic Modeling 26(3), May, 668–679. http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecmode/v26y2009i3p668-679.html
Cited by
28 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Contents;Edition Politik;2024-06-04
2. Frontmatter;Edition Politik;2024-06-04
3. Appendices;Edition Politik;2024-06-04
4. List of references;Edition Politik;2024-06-04
5. Chapter 6. Summary and Conclusion;Edition Politik;2024-06-04