Affiliation:
1. Department of Business and Economics , University of Southern Denmark , Odense , Denmark .
2. Aarhus University Library , Aarhus , Denmark
Abstract
Abstract
Roy (Safety First and the Holding of Assets, 1952) argues that decisions under uncertainty motivate firms to avoid bankruptcy. In this paper, the authors ask about the behaviour of a monopolist who pre-commits to price when she has only probabilistic knowledge about demand. They argue that pricing in order to maximise the likelihood of survival explains anomalies such as inelastic pricing, why the firm takes on more risk as gains become less likely, and asymmetric responses to demand and cost changes. When demand is a linear demand, the monopolist’s response to an increase in the marginal cost is similar to the response when mark-up pricing is used. That is, there is a one-to-one relationship between an increase of the marginal cost and an increase in price.
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference29 articles.
1. Allen, B., and Hellwig, M. (1986). Price-Setting Firms and the Oligopolistic Foundations of Perfect Competition. American Economic Review 76(2): 387–392. http://econpapers.repec.org/article/aeaaecrev/v_3a76_3ay_3a1986_3ai_3a2_3ap_3a387-92.htm
2. Andersen, P., and Nielsen, M. (2013). Inelastic Sports Pricing and Risk. Economics Letters 118(2): 262–264.ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolet/v118y2013i2p262-264.html
3. Arzac, E.R. (1976). Profits and Safety in the Theory of the Firm under Price Uncertainty. International Economic Review 17(1): 163–171.ideas.repec.org/a/ier/iecrev/v17y1976i1p163-71.html
4. Asplund, M. (2007). A Test of Profit Maximization. London: CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP6177.ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/6177.html
5. Baldenius, T., and Reichelstein, S. (2000). Comparative Statics of Monopoly Pricing. Economic Theory 16(2): 465–469. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25055336?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献