Affiliation:
1. Stockholm Environment Institute – U.S. Center , Somerville
Abstract
Abstract
The social cost of carbon – or marginal damage caused by an additional ton of carbon dioxide emissions – has been estimated by a U.S. government working group at $21/tCO2 in 2010. That calculation, however, omits many of the biggest risks associated with climate change, and downplays the impact of current emissions on future generations. Our reanalysis explores the effects of uncertainty about climate sensitivity, the shape of the damage function, and the discount rate. We show that the social cost of carbon is uncertain across a broad range, and could be much higher than $21/tCO2. In our case combining high climate sensitivity, high damages, and a low discount rate, the social cost of carbon could be almost $900/tCO2 in 2010, rising to $1,500/tCO2 in 2050.
The most ambitious scenarios for eliminating carbon dioxide emissions as rapidly as technologically feasible (reaching zero or negative net global emissions by the end of this century) require spending up to $150 to $500 per ton of reductions of carbon dioxide emissions by 2050. Using a reasonable set of alternative assumptions, therefore, the damages from a ton of carbon dioxide emissions in 2050 could exceed the cost of reducing emissions at the maximum technically feasible rate. Once this is the case, the exact value of the social cost of carbon loses importance: the clear policy prescription is to reduce emissions as rapidly as possible, and cost-effectiveness analysis offers better insights for climate policy than costbenefit analysis.
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference29 articles.
1. Ackerman, Frank, and Elizabeth A. Stanton ( 2010). The Social Cost of Carbon. Somerville, MA: Stockholm Environment Institute-U.S. Center, April 1. http://sei-us.org/publications/id/194.
2. Arrow, Kenneth, W.R. Cline, K-G. Maler, M. Munasinghe, R. Squitieri, and J.E. Stiglitz (1996). Chapter 4 – Intertemporal Equity, Discounting, and Economic Efficiency. In Climate Change 1995 - Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Second Assessment Report of the IPCC, ed. James P. Bruce, Hoesung Lee, and Erik F. Haites, 125–144. New York: IPCC and Cambridge University Press. http://www2.gsb.columbia.edu/faculty/jstiglitz/download/papers/1996_Intertemporal_Equity.pdf.
3. Barker, Terry, and Serban Scrieciu (2010). Modeling Low Climate Stabilization with E3MG: Towards a ‘New Economics’ Approach to Simulating Energy- Environment-Economy System Dynamics. Energy Journal 31 (Special Issue 1): 137–164. http://econpapers.repec.org/article/aenjournl/2010se1_5flow_5fstabilizationa06.htm
4. Clarke, Leon, Jae Edmonds, Volker Krey, Richard Richels, Steven Rose, and Massimo Tavoni (2009). International Climate Policy Architectures: Overview of the EMF 22 International Scenarios. Energy Economics 31 (December): S64–S81. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2009.10.013. http://emf.stanford.edu/files/res/2369/EMF22OverviewClarke.pdf
5. DeLong, J. Bradford, and Konstantin Magin (2009). The U.S. Equity Return Premium: Past, Present, and Future. Journal of Economic Perspectives 23 (1) (January): 193–208. doi:10.1257/jep.23.1.193. http://ideas.repec.org/a/aea/jecper/v23y2009i1p193-208.html
Cited by
164 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献