Affiliation:
1. Department of Social, Political, and Cognitive Sciences , University of Siena , Siena , Italy
2. Department of Economics and Management , University of Trento , Trento , Italy
Abstract
Abstract
The ‘Five Presidents Report’ cited in the title acknowledges that an important driver of the European economic crisis has been the faulty original design of the Monetary Union, and that substantial steps are urgently needed towards the creation of truly supranational institutions. Yet, economists tend to neglect that however compelling economic analyses may be, the stumbling block on the way of the reform of the Monetary Union is political will, and that in democracies the ultimate source of political will comes from electors. In this paper, first of all the authors wish to bring to the economists’ attention some recent analyses of citizens’ attitudes towards Europe from political science. Then, by cross-referencing the results of the 2014 elections of the European Parliament with Eurobarometer opinion polls eliciting judgements for the EU vis-à-vis home countries and an indicator of economic pain, the authors show the presence of a geo-economicpolitical cleavage across four groups of countries. This is more complex, and perhaps worse, than the simplistic divide between ‘North’ and ‘South’ or ‘Core’ and ‘Periphery’. The main implication is that the EU experiences a stalemate between ‘more Europe vs. less Europe’ at the level of peoples, which seriously undermines support for further integration ‘from below’.
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference28 articles.
1. Baldwin, R., and Giavazzi, F. (eds.) (2015). The Eurozone Crisis. A Consensus View of the Causes and a Few Possible Solutions. London: CEPR Press.
2. Baron, J. (1994). Thinking and Deciding. New York: Cambridge University Press.
3. Bertsou, E. (2014). The 2014 EP Elections: A Victory for European Democracy? LSE-European Institute, Europe in Question Discussion Paper Series, n. 78. http://www.lse.ac.uk/europeanInstitute/LEQS%20Discussion%20Paper%20Series/LEQSPaper78.pdf
4. Boitani, A., Saraceno, F., Talani, S.L., Tamborini, R., and Torres, F. (eds.) (2016). New Institutions for an Effective EU and EMU Governance. Special Issue, Journal of Economic Policy–Politica Economica 32(3): 375–386.
5. Bølstad, J. (2015). Dynamics of European Integration: Public Opinion in the Core and Periphery. European Union Politics 16(1): 23–44. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1465116514551303