Affiliation:
1. “EyeDoctor” Ophthalmologic Clinic of MD Molokotin
Abstract
Purpose: compare the results of implantation of two types of premium IOLs (Synergy and PanOptix) according to several criteria.Materials and methods. Patients were treated in the “EyeDoctor” ophthalmology clinic, Almaty, Kazakhstan. Synergy group: 8 people (4 men and 4 women.) PanOptix group: 25 people (9 men and 16 women).Results. A month after the operation, results were special but comparable.Conclusion. It can be concluded that the hybrid IOL Synergy is in not inferion in refractive results to well matched PanOptix.
Publisher
PE Polunina Elizareta Gennadievna
Reference15 articles.
1. Pershin KB, Pashinova NF, Konovalova MM, Tsygankov AYu, Konovalov ME. Multifocal Intraocular Lenses Implantation in Presbyopia Correction. Literature Review. Acta biomedica scientifica. 2019;4(4):41–55 (In Russ.). doi: 10.29413/ABS.2019‑4.4.6.
2. Pershin KB, Pashinova NF, Tsygankov AYu, Miyovich OP. The outcomes of the implantation of bifocal and trifocal IOLs for presbyopia. Cataract and refractive surgery. 2016;16(2):23–29 (In Russ.).
3. Pershin KB, Pashinova NF, Tsygankov AYu. Presbyopia‑correcting surgical options. Cataract and refractive surgery. 2016;16(2):4–14 (In Russ.).
4. Fricke TR, Tahhan N, Resnikoff S, Papas E, Burnett A, Ho SM, Naduvilath T, Naidoo KS. Global Prevalence of Presbyopia and Vision Impairment from Uncorrected Presbyopia: Systematic Review, Meta‑analysis, and Modelling. Ophthalmology. 2018 Oct;125(10):1492–1499. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.04.013.
5. Schor C, Landsman L, Erickson P. Ocular dominance and the interocular suppression of blur in monovision Amer. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 1987;64:723–730.