The 4% Fallacy: A Methodological and Empirical Critique of Extended Care Facility Population Statistics

Author:

Kastenbaum Robert1,Candy Sandra E.2

Affiliation:

1. University of Massachusetts, Boston, Mass

2. Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan

Abstract

Much use has been made of population statistics which indicate that only 4% of those over 65 are in nursing homes and other extended care facilities (ECF). These data are misleading, however, for they are cross-sectional and seriously underestimate the probability of a person coming to an ECF sooner or later. Two small empirical studies are reported using, respectively, published obituary notices and death certificates for the metropolitan Detroit area during 1971. It was found that a minimum of 20% of all men and women over 65 who died in the study year were residents of a nursing home, and 24% were residents of one or another kind of ECF. Clearly, more people died in ECFs than are usually thought to be there in the first place. Discussion focuses upon the magnitude of the terminal care problem and the need to recognize the full scope of ECF difficulties which have often been underestimated because of careless use of the population data.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Ageing

Cited by 73 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Regional Variation in Lifetime Probability of Admission to Residential Aged Care in Australia;Journal of Aging and Health;2024-04-26

2. Likelihood of residential aged care use in later life: a simple approach to estimation with international comparison;Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health;2015-06-11

3. Sooner or later? A study of institutionalization in late life;Aging Clinical and Experimental Research;2009-08

4. The Costs of Long-term Care: Distribution and Responsibility;Ciba Foundation Symposium 134 - Research and the Ageing Population;2007-09-28

5. Is Death the Spice of Life?;Illness, Crisis & Loss;2003-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3