Social Science and Medical Education in Britain: A Sociologic Analysis of Their Relationship

Author:

Jefferys Margot

Abstract

The introduction of social science teaching into the medical school curriculum in Great Britain has been slow despite the strong recommendation of the Royal Commission on Medical Education in 1968. Factors which are responsible for the sluggishness reflect the influence of the practitioners in the health care system, the power structure in the medical schools, the medical student body, and the social scientists. Ambivalence among all these factions toward social science teaching has inhibited innovatory programs. The analysis suggests that the social sciences will not make an effective contribution to medical education while all these actors remain ambivalent. Moreover, the ambivalence reflects the lack of a clear picture of the future role of the physician. The issue is whether he is to be a super technologist or an applied behavioral scientist. Although the analysis of past trends and future prospects is based on British data, it is regarded as holding true for other highly industrialized societies.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Policy

Reference35 articles.

1. United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Behavioral Sciences and Medical Education. DHEW Publication No. (NIH) 72–41, 1973.

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3