Evaluation of Medical-Psychiatric Consultation

Author:

Sasser Michael1,Kinzie J. David2

Affiliation:

1. Resident, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oregon Health Sciences Center

2. Associate Professor of Psychiatry, Director, Residency Training Program, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oregon Health Sciences Center

Abstract

This report describes four approaches to the evaluation of hospital psychiatric consultation. These are: 1) a survey of actual consultation use; 2) a house staff attitudinal survey; 3) a patient chart review; and 4) a patient questionnaire. The findings of this project and those previously reported are: 1) The psychiatric consultation is under-utilized and a large number of house staff find it not useful. 2) The psychiatric and non-psychiatric house staff view the functions of consultation in markedly different ways. 3) A high percentage of written consultation reports are too vague to determine if the needs of the referring physician were met. 4) Patients usually respond positively to psychiatric consultation. The implications of these findings are discussed in this report.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

Cited by 19 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3