Affiliation:
1. California State University, San Bernardino
Abstract
Computerized instruction has already affected our accepted notions of “teaching” to a considerable extent, and is certain to have increasing influence in the future. As we cultivate computerized technology into our educational systems, care must be taken to insure that these new computerized methods are in accordance with our hard-earned knowledge concerning teaching and learning. This study investigates the difference between Computer-assisted Instruction (CAI) and the more traditional lecture instruction in teaching an office technology course. Results using t-tests indicated that students in the CAI group performed better on achievement tests than those students in the lecture group. There was also a significant positive change in students' attitudes toward CAI.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Computer-Assisted Instruction, Media Richness, and College Student Performance A previous version of this paper was presented at the 2004 (November) Conference of the National Communication Association, Chicago, IL. Portions of the data presented in this study are also included in Timmerman, C. E., & Kruepke, K. A. (in press). Computer-assisted instruction and college student performance. In B. Gayle, R. Preiss, N. Burrell, & M. Allen (Eds.). Classroom communication and instructional processes: Advances through meta-analysis.;Communication Education;2006-01
2. Improved Training Methods through the Use of Multimedia Technology;Journal of Computer Information Systems;1999-12
3. E-Mail’s Role in the Learning Process;Journal of Research on Computing in Education;1992-12
4. CBT has the edge in a comparative study;Performance + Instruction;1990-08