Hypnotic Hallucinations as “Unmonitored” Images: An Empirical Study

Author:

Kunzendorf Robert G.1

Affiliation:

1. University of Lowell

Abstract

In studying waking images and hypnotic hallucinations, most psychologists have implicitly adopted Hume's sensory continuum theory: that perceived sensations and imaged sensations differ only inasmuch as the latter tend to be less vivid. The current research contrasts sensory continuum theory with an alternative theory: that the central innervation of waking images, especially vivid images, is neurally monitored and tacitly known. To the extent that vivid images demand a greater amount of central innervation, the image-monitoring process should register them more quickly than faint images, even though vivid images are closer to percepts on the sensory continuum. Consistent with image-monitoring theory and contrary to sensory continuum theory, waking subjects discriminated percepts more quickly from vivid images than from faint images. In contrast, deeply hypnotized subjects did not discriminate percepts most quickly from vivid images. The latter result suggests that deep hypnosis attenuates the monitoring process and, thereby, turns “centrally innervated” images into “unmonitored” hallucinations – the most vivid of which tend to be least distinguishable from hypnotic percepts.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 28 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Hallucinations as intensified forms of mind-wandering;Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences;2020-12-14

2. Source monitoring as an explanation for the illusion of “self as subject”.;Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice;2020-02-10

3. Metacognition of agency is reduced in high hypnotic suggestibility;Cognition;2017-11

4. Nuances and Uncertainties Regarding Hypnotic Inductions: Toward a Theoretically Informed Praxis;American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis;2016-09-02

5. The Sense of Self in Lucid Dreams: “Self as Subject” vs. “Self as Agent” vs. “Self as Object”;Imagination, Cognition and Personality;2007-06

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3