Abstract
In the early 20th century, U.S. monopoly corporations responded to the movement against work accidents by setting up a business-controlled “compensation-safety establishment,” which kept down compensation costs but did little to improve working conditions. This “establishment” was able to keep the issue of occupational safety and health out of public debate until the late 1960s through its control of research, education, compensation, and government appointments in the area, and by creating the public impression that the problems of occupational disease were almost nonexistent. Despite the occurrence of sporadic rank-and-file uprisings, unions have been seriously involved in health and safety only since the late 1960s, when they mobilized in an effort to pass the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970. The passage of the OSHA law was made possible by the help of progressive professionals, worker dissatisfaction, the new environmental consciousness, and a general climate of social unrest. Although the corporate elite, through the “compensation-safety establishment,” has been able to dominate the operation of the federal institutions created by the new law, the question of occupational health and safety is now on the permanent agenda of workers, unions, and the public.
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Bibliography;Sick Building Syndrome and the Problem of Uncertainty;2006
2. Notes;Sick Building Syndrome and the Problem of Uncertainty;2006
3. Epilogue;Sick Building Syndrome and the Problem of Uncertainty;2006
4. How to Build Yourself a Body in a Safe Space;Sick Building Syndrome and the Problem of Uncertainty;2006
5. Building Ecologies, Tobacco, and the Politics of Multiplicity;Sick Building Syndrome and the Problem of Uncertainty;2006