Abstract
The 15-year history of a study on the health effects of low-dose radiation on workers at the Hanford Atomic Plant in Washington State demonstrates different facets of political control by employers over investigations of employee working conditions. Evidence obtained through the Freedom of Information Act shows that the original study, under the guidance of Dr. Thomas Mancuso, an experienced and respected occupational health epidemiologist, was funded even though its design was thought to be inadequate in order to furnish proof to employees that their exposure levels were safe. When it turned out that the study might show an increase in cancer rates among plant employees, its control was transferred to the employer. Public reports by scientists working for the employer are at variance with independent analyses of the same data. Lessons from these events are that it may be necessary for organized labor to negotiate the conduct of occupational health investigations as part of negotiated settlements and for legal means to be developed to make health scientists accountable for actions that influence public health policies.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. The truth will out: a reflection on the life and times of Alice Stewart;International Journal of Radiation Biology;2021-09-27
2. Worker Alienation and Compensation at the Savannah River Site;NEW SOLUTIONS: A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy;2016-03-08
3. Ethics for Environmental Health Research: The Case of the U.S. Nuclear Weapons Industry;NEW SOLUTIONS: A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy;2010-07-09
4. Objectivity and ethics in environmental health science.;Environmental Health Perspectives;2003-11
5. The Relevance of Occupational Epidemiology to Radiation Protection Standards;NEW SOLUTIONS: A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy;1999-08