Does Hypnotic Amnesia Dissipate with Time?

Author:

Dubreuil Debora L.1,Spanos Nicholas P.2,Bertrand Lorne D.2

Affiliation:

1. York University

2. Carleton University

Abstract

Two interrelated experiments investigated the hypothesis that hypnotic amnesia dissipates “spontaneously” over time. After the administration of a hypnotic amnesia suggestion for a previously learned word list, Retest subjects in Experiment 1 received two successive recall challenges before cancellation of the suggestion. Delay subjects received only one challenge. It occurred at the same time that Retest subjects received their second challenge. No differences in amount of amnesia were found between the Delay trial and either of the Retest trials, thereby failing to provide support for the dissipation hypothesis. Experiment 2 manipulated subjects' expectations concerning the amount of amnesia typically shown on a second challenge. Subjects in the “Remember More” or “Remember Less” conditions were led to believe that they would recall either more or less critical material on the second amnesia challenge. Both Retest (no expectancy) and Remember More subjects recalled significantly more words on the second challenge than on the first. However, a significantly greater proportion of Remember More subjects than Retest subjects showed recall increments on the second challenge. Remember Less subjects showed no significant difference in the amount recalled on the two challenges. These results do not support the dissipation hypothesis of hypnotic amnesia. Instead, they are consistent with theoretical accounts of amnesia as a strategic enactment carried out by subjects in response to the unfolding social demands of the testing situation.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Contextual effects on priming during hypnotic amnesia;Journal of Research in Personality;1990-09

2. Posthypnotic Amnesia: Dissociation of Self-Concept or Self-Consciousness?;Imagination, Cognition and Personality;1990-06

3. Hypnotic behavior: Special process accounts are still not required;Behavioral and Brain Sciences;1987-12

4. Seeing through social influence: Hypnotic hallucinations are opaque;Behavioral and Brain Sciences;1987-12

5. A puzzle about hypnosis that grandma may still have;Behavioral and Brain Sciences;1987-12

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3