Author:
Bamberger Michelle,Oswald Robert E.
Abstract
Environmental concerns surrounding drilling for gas are intense due to expansion of shale gas drilling operations. Controversy surrounding the impact of drilling on air and water quality has pitted industry and leaseholders against individuals and groups concerned with environmental protection and public health. Because animals often are exposed continually to air, soil, and groundwater and have more frequent reproductive cycles, animals can be used as sentinels to monitor impacts to human health. This study involved interviews with animal owners who live near gas drilling operations. The findings illustrate which aspects of the drilling process may lead to health problems and suggest modifications that would lessen but not eliminate impacts. Complete evidence regarding health impacts of gas drilling cannot be obtained due to incomplete testing and disclosure of chemicals, and nondisclosure agreements. Without rigorous scientific studies, the gas drilling boom sweeping the world will remain an uncontrolled health experiment on an enormous scale.
Reference68 articles.
1. U.S. Department of Energy, "Natural Gas" http://www.energy.gov/energysources/naturalgas.htm
2. Chesapeake Energy, "Water Use in Marcellus Deep Shale Gas Exploration" http://www.chk.com/Media/Educational-Library/Fact-Sheets/Marcellus/Marcellus_Water_Use_Fact_Sheet.pdf
3. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Fossil Energy and National Energy Technology Laboratory, "Modern Shale Gas Development in the United States: A Primer" http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/oil-gas/publications/EPreports/Shale_Gas_Primer_2009.pdf
4. K. Cohen, "Facts on the Hydraulic Fracturing Process" http://www.exxonmobilperspectives.com/2011/06/17/facts-hydraulic-fracturing-process/
5. Natural Gas Operations from a Public Health Perspective;T. Colborn;Journal of Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal,2011
Cited by
163 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献