Affiliation:
1. Erasmus University, Rotterdam
2. Leuven University Press, Belgium
Abstract
This article deals with the process of canon formation for Flemish and Dutch painters from the 17th century onwards. We examine how the essential art-historical treatises and art encyclopedias since Houbraken's Grote Schouburgh der Nederlandsche Konstschilders en Schilderessen ranked and evaluated the leading painters, based on the attention given to them in these volumes. Using standardized z-scores, we map the relative importance the selected artists received in these publications over the 3 centuries. In doing so, we emphasize the path-dependency and the dimension of time in explaining the endurance of certain artists in the long run. From our research it emanates that the canon of Netherlandish painters is much more volatile than previously assumed.
Subject
Literature and Literary Theory,Music,Visual Arts and Performing Arts
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Ernsthafte Kunstwelten;Die Ökonomien von ernsthafter und populärer Kunst;2024
2. The German art market during WW II;European Review of Economic History;2023-02-10
3. Exemplary Directors, European Imports, and the Changing Valuation of Films in Hollywood, 1961–1980;Cultural Sociology;2022-05-27
4. Serious Artworlds;The Economies of Serious and Popular Art;2022
5. Monthly Art Market Returns;Journal of Risk and Financial Management;2020-05-19