Is Psychiatric Consultation in Abortion Obsolete?

Author:

Marmer Stephen S.1,Pasnau Robert O.1,Cushner Irvin M.1

Affiliation:

1. University of California School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California

Abstract

The 1973 United States Supreme Court decision removing all impediments to abortion requested by adult women in the first trimester eliminated the necessity for psychiatrists to “approve” such abortions on psychiatric grounds. At the same time, the development of new thinking about post-abortion emotional problems occurred. It was shown that despite the formerly widely held view that abortion was usually followed by psychiatric illness, such complications are in fact rare. Therefore, the two principle reasons for routine psychiatric consultations in abortion cases are no longer viable. Nevertheless, there are important indications for psychiatric involvement in pre- and post-abortion counseling and consultation which cannot be overlooked. These can be summarized as cases in which: 1) the woman exhibits marked ambivalence, or in which motivation for continuing or terminating the pregnancy is suspect; 2) unhealthy, self-destructive or inappropriate use of sexuality results in pregnancy, with the use of abortion as birth-control; 3) the woman is incompetent to decide on continuation or termination of pregnancy; 4) a serious physical illness may have compromised the ability of the woman to cope emotionally with the issue of pregnancy or abortion; 5) there is a history of prior psychiatric illness, especially postpartum illness or suicidal behavior; or 6) the primary role of the psychiatrist is in liaison or education of the physician or staff. Six illustrative cases are briefly presented and discussed.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3