Affiliation:
1. Institute of Economics CS MES RK
2. Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
Abstract
In the conditions of sustainable development, special attention is paid to the balanced development of the territory. In regional studies, the study of the state of depressed settlements has scientific and practical relevance. In this regard, the conceptual analysis of the concept «depressed region» and «vulnerability of settlements» allows us to define important parameters for the study. The aim of the article is an empirical analysis of the socio-economic problems of vulnerable settlements. Based on the literature study, the conceptual bases of depressiveness and social vulnerability of settlements are highlighted, and the main parameters of its assessment are singled out. The method of data collection was a questionnaire. As a result of a sociological survey of the population, the sample consisted of 300 respondents from vulnerable areas in East Kazakhstan, Zhambyl, and North Kazakhstan regions. According to the results of the survey, several socio-economic issues among the settlements can be identified: lack of livelihood, there is no opportunity for development, poor infrastructure, lack of jobs and opportunities to earn money, poor living conditions, poor environment, problems with getting vocational education, retraining, etc. According to the survey, it is important to develop infrastructure. To address the development of depressed and vulnerable settlements, it is necessary to create transport and social infrastructure: road network, communications, Internet, development of organizational and economic mechanisms: increasing state support for local businesses, strengthening the role of local authorities, providing soft loans and subsidies to the population, providing settlements with social facilities, providing grants for the development of their businesses.
Publisher
The economy: strategy and practice, Institute of Economics Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Subject
Religious studies,Cultural Studies
Reference28 articles.
1. Abson, D.J., Dougill, A.J., & Stringer, L.C. (2012). Using Principal Component Analysis for information-rich socio-ecological vulnerability mapping in Southern Africa. Applied Geography, 35, 515-524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.08.004.
2. Adger, W.N. (2006). Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16 (3), 268-281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006
3. Asmus, O.V. (2008). The development of the agricultural sector in the depressed regions of the Russian Federation: theory, methodology, practice. Moscow, Russian research institute of economy of agriculture of Russian Academy of Agricultural Sciences. (In Russ.)
4. Birch, K., MacKinnon, D., & Cumbers, A. (2010). Old industrial regions in Europe: a comparative assessment of economic performance. Regional Studies, 44(1), 35-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400802195147.
5. Birkmann, J., Cardona, O.D., Carreño, M.L., Barbat, A.H., Pelling, M., Schneiderbauer, S., Kienberger, S., Keiler, M., Alexander, D., Zeil, P., & Welle, T. (2013). Framing vulnerability, risk and societal responses: the MOVE framework. Natural Hazards, 67, 193-211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0558-5
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献