The use of homeopathy in veterinary medicine: a systematic review

Author:

Bez Isabela Cristina ColaçoORCID,Paula Gustavo Zigovski deORCID,Revers Nathalia Bianca Marloch,Oliveira Angela Cristina da Fonseca de,Weber Saulo HenriqueORCID,Sotomaior Cristina SantosORCID,Costa Leandro BatistaORCID

Abstract

Although its use remains controversial, homeopathy has been proposed as an integrative approach alongside conventional medicine. This systematic review aimed to validate the use of homeopathy in veterinary using randomized controlled trials as the gold standard methodology. We performed a broad bibliographic search on the use of homeopathy in veterinary medicine published between 2016 and 2023, following the prerequisites and protocol established by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Cochrane Training. All searched studies were excluded if they did not fit the chosen methodology. Studies were identified based on their data and passed through a selection process. The selected studies were then assessed for risk of bias. The initial database search yielded 161 documents. Of these, 126 studies were excluded because they were not within the scope of the review, either by title or abstract. In total, 35 articles remained and underwent a data extraction process followed by study selection. Due to its methodologies, many studies with high sampling densities, encompassing numerous species and diseases, were not included in this review. Eight articles met the requirements of the present study. The articles predominantly focused on diseases, which may be attributed to the fact that treating such diseases makes it easier to validate the use of homeopathics in veterinary medicine, rather than solely employing it for prevention, as observed in the majority of the outcomes. Only four studies exhibited an overall low risk of bias. There is a scant number of robust evidence for veterinary homeopathy. With that, further randomized controlled trials involving the same species are warranted to valitade its use; the limited number of articles did not allow us to conduct a meta-analysis. This systematic review illustrates the need for a better description of the methodologies used in these studies.

Publisher

Universidade Estadual de Londrina

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3