In vitro embryos production of oocytes selected based on follicular size and by brilliant cresyl blue staining

Author:

Barros Fabiana Dakkach de AlmeidaORCID,Adona Paulo RobertoORCID,Guemra SamuelORCID,De Bem Tiago Henrique CamaraORCID,Monzani Paulo SergioORCID,Leal Claudia Lima VerdeORCID

Abstract

We evaluated the competence of bovine oocytes via morphological selection associated with follicular diameter and by brilliant cresyl blue (BCB) staining, in order to improve oocyte selection and the efficiency of in vitro embryo production. Follicles with small (2 < 4 mm), large (4–8 mm) or mixed (2–8 mm) diameters were aspirated from slaughterhouse ovaries. Next, the morphologically categorized oocytes were stained and evaluated with 26 ?M of BCB (90 min), followed by an assessment of in vitro maturation (MII) and blastocyst production. Oocytes from the large (61.1 ± 3.9%) and mixed (52.9 ± 4.6%) follicular groups showed comparable (p > 0,05) BCB+ rates, but both differed (p < 0.05) as compared to the small-diameter group (41.0 ± 4.5%). Between the BCB+ and BCB – oocytes, there was no difference (p > 0,05) in MII rate in the mixed (respectively 86.7 ± 3.4 and 75.8 ± 2.2), large (respectively 89.4 ± 2.6 and 79.7 ± 2.3) and small (respectively 76.7 ± 2.9 and 67.2 ± 2.5) diameter groups. Comparing BCB (+ and -) oocytes, we observed (p > 0,05) no change in the percentage of embryos in the large group (respectively 67.3 ± 3.3 and 53.5 ± 5.8) and in the small group (respectively 43.8 ± 5.3 and 33.9 ± 2.2), but there was a difference (p < 0.05) in the mixed group (respectively 57.8 ± 3.9 and 39.6 ± 7.5). Furthermore, when we compared between follicular groups, the BCB+/large-diameter group (61.1 ± 3.9%) had a significant higher percentage of embryos (p < 0.05) than the small-diameter BCB+ (43.8 ± 5.3) groups. To conclude, selection procedures that use follicle size and/or BCB staining may be used as an additional tool to improve the in vitro production of embryos.

Publisher

Universidade Estadual de Londrina

Subject

General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3