A restatement of the natural science evidence concerning catchment-based ‘natural’ flood management in the UK

Author:

Dadson Simon J.1ORCID,Hall Jim W.1,Murgatroyd Anna1,Acreman Mike2,Bates Paul3,Beven Keith4,Heathwaite Louise4,Holden Joseph5,Holman Ian P.6,Lane Stuart N.7,O'Connell Enda8,Penning-Rowsell Edmund19,Reynard Nick2,Sear David10,Thorne Colin11,Wilby Rob12

Affiliation:

1. School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QY, UK

2. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford OX10 8BB, UK

3. School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1SS, UK

4. Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, UK

5. School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK

6. Cranfield Water Science Institute, Cranfield University, Cranfield MK43 0AL, UK

7. Faculté des géosciences et de l'environnement, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne CH-1015, Switzerland

8. School of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

9. Flood Hazard Research Centre, Middlesex University, The Burroughs, London NW4 4BT, UK

10. Geography and Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

11. School of Geography, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK

12. Department of Geography, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, UK

Abstract

Flooding is a very costly natural hazard in the UK and is expected to increase further under future climate change scenarios. Flood defences are commonly deployed to protect communities and property from flooding, but in recent years flood management policy has looked towards solutions that seek to mitigate flood risk at flood-prone sites through targeted interventions throughout the catchment, sometimes using techniques which involve working with natural processes. This paper describes a project to provide a succinct summary of the natural science evidence base concerning the effectiveness of catchment-based ‘natural’ flood management in the UK. The evidence summary is designed to be read by an informed but not technically specialist audience. Each evidence statement is placed into one of four categories describing the nature of the underlying information. The evidence summary forms the appendix to this paper and an annotated bibliography is provided in the electronic supplementary material.

Publisher

The Royal Society

Subject

General Physics and Astronomy,General Engineering,General Mathematics

Reference6 articles.

1. Beedell J Morris J Hess TM. 2011 Mobilising the Contribution of Rural Land Management to Flood Risk Management in Scotland. Report to Scottish Government CR/2010/14.

2. A restatement of the natural science evidence base relevant to the control of bovine tuberculosis in Great Britain †

3. A restatement of the natural science evidence base concerning neonicotinoid insecticides and insect pollinators

4. Updated precipitation series for the U.K. and discussion of recent extremes;Alexander LV;Atmos. Sci. Lett.,2001

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3