Verification of cardiac mechanics software: benchmark problems and solutions for testing active and passive material behaviour

Author:

Land Sander1ORCID,Gurev Viatcheslav2,Arens Sander3,Augustin Christoph M.4,Baron Lukas5,Blake Robert6,Bradley Chris7,Castro Sebastian8,Crozier Andrew4,Favino Marco9,Fastl Thomas E.1,Fritz Thomas5,Gao Hao10,Gizzi Alessio11,Griffith Boyce E.12,Hurtado Daniel E.8,Krause Rolf9,Luo Xiaoyu10,Nash Martyn P.713,Pezzuto Simone914,Plank Gernot4,Rossi Simone15,Ruprecht Daniel9,Seemann Gunnar5,Smith Nicolas P.113,Sundnes Joakim14,Rice J. Jeremy2,Trayanova Natalia6,Wang Dafang6,Jenny Wang Zhinuo7,Niederer Steven A.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK

2. Thomas J. Watson Research Center, IBM Research, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598, USA

3. Department of Physics and Astronomy, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

4. Institute of Biophysics, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria

5. Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany

6. Department of Biomedical Engineering and Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA

7. Auckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

8. Department of Structural and Geotechnical Engineering, Pontifica Universidad Católica de Chile, Chile

9. Center for Computational Medicine in Cardiology, Institute of Computational Science, Università della Svizzera italiana, Lugano, Switzerland

10. School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK

11. Department of Engineering, Nonlinear Physics and Mathematical Modeling Lab, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Rome, Italy

12. Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

13. Department of Engineering Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

14. Simula Research Laboratory, Fornebu, Norway

15. Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708-0287, USA

Abstract

Models of cardiac mechanics are increasingly used to investigate cardiac physiology. These models are characterized by a high level of complexity, including the particular anisotropic material properties of biological tissue and the actively contracting material. A large number of independent simulation codes have been developed, but a consistent way of verifying the accuracy and replicability of simulations is lacking. To aid in the verification of current and future cardiac mechanics solvers, this study provides three benchmark problems for cardiac mechanics. These benchmark problems test the ability to accurately simulate pressure-type forces that depend on the deformed objects geometry, anisotropic and spatially varying material properties similar to those seen in the left ventricle and active contractile forces. The benchmark was solved by 11 different groups to generate consensus solutions, with typical differences in higher-resolution solutions at approximately 0.5%, and consistent results between linear, quadratic and cubic finite elements as well as different approaches to simulating incompressible materials. Online tools and solutions are made available to allow these tests to be effectively used in verification of future cardiac mechanics software.

Funder

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council

Publisher

The Royal Society

Subject

General Physics and Astronomy,General Engineering,General Mathematics

Cited by 96 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3