Abstract
Remains of a fossil amphibian have been recovered from an ironstone layer in the Upper Evergreen Formation, dated as late Liassic, of southeast Queensland. Extraction of the skeleton from the very hard matrix has presented a number of problem s which are discussed. The find is an almost complete skull and mandible connected to an articulated postcranial skeleton which is missing only some ribs, the right hind leg and the distal portions of the other limbs and tail. The remains are those of a temnospondyl labyrinthodont described as a new genus and species of the family Chigutisauridae. The new form is notable for its very large size (total length estimated to be in excess of 2.5 m), relatively large marginal dentition, with unique lance-shaped tooth tips, the presence of minute denticles associated with the palate and mandible, a well developed atlas showing a strong link with the axis, neorhachitomous vertebrae that lack ossified pleurocentra and have low, heavily built neural spines, a neck region and a narrow dermal pectoral girdle associated with unreduced limbs. The discovery of this chigutisaur provides the first unequivocal evidence that labyrinthodonts survived beyond the end of the Triassic. T he status of two previously described doubtful Jurassic forms is reviewed.
Austropelor
Longman, 1941, from the Early Jurassic Marburg Sandstone of southeast Queensland, is confirmed as a fragm ent of temnospondyl lower jaw , probably attributable to the superfamily Brachyopoidea, and there is no longer any reason to consider the earlier suggestion that it is a reworked Triassic fossil.
Cyrtura
Jaekel, 1904, from the Late Jurassic Solnhofen Shale of Germany, is considered not to be a labyrinthodont, but its exact relationships are uncertain. The unsatisfactory nature of the higher taxonomy of the Temnospondyli is noted. The superfamily Brachyopoidea is reviewed and the family Kourerpetontidae is removed from it, membership of the superfamily thereby being restricted to the Brachyopidae (Late Permian to Middle Triassic) and Chigutisauridae (Early Triassic to Early Jurassic). Diagnoses for the superfamily and its two included families are provided. The relationships of the better characterized members of the two families are examined and a phylogeny based on shared derived character states is proposed. The analysis of relationships indicates that
Brachyops allos
Howie, 1972 shares few of the characters diagnostic of the type of
Brachyops
(B. laticeps Owen, 1855), and a new genus is proposed. The diversity of Australia’s brachyopoids, including the presence of the most primitive and earliest-known members of each of the included families, suggests that the superfamily originated in Australia.
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Business, Management and Accounting,Materials Science (miscellaneous),Business and International Management
Reference84 articles.
1. Descripdon of a new plesiosaur from the Weald Clay of Berwick (Sussex). geol;Andrews C. W.;Soc. Lond.,1922
2. Banks M. R. 1978 Correlation chart for the Triassic System of Australia. Bull. Bur. Miner. Resour. Geol. no. 156C.
3. The discovery of plesiosaurian remains in freshwater sediments;Bartholomai A.;Queensland. Aust. J. Sci.,1966
4. Cranial morphology of the Loxommatidae (Amphibia: Labyrinthodontia)
5. Lissamphibian Origins: Possible Protolissamphibian from the Lower Permian of Oklahoma
Cited by
83 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献