A simple optical flow model explains why certain object viewpoints are special

Author:

Stewart Emma E. M.123ORCID,Fleming Roland W.45ORCID,Schütz Alexander C.56

Affiliation:

1. School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University London , London E14NS, UK

2. Department of Experimental and Biological Psychology, Queen Mary University London , London E14NS, UK

3. Centre for Brain and Behaviour, Queen Mary University London , London E14NS, UK

4. Department of Experimental Psychology, Justus Liebig University Giessen , Giessen 35394, Germany

5. Centre for Mind, Brain, and Behaviour (CMBB), University of Marburg and Justus Liebig University Giessen , Giessen 35032, Germany

6. General and Experimental Psychology, University of Marburg , Marburg 35032, Germany

Abstract

A core challenge in perception is recognizing objects across the highly variable retinal input that occurs when objects are viewed from different directions (e.g. front versus side views). It has long been known that certain views are of particular importance, but it remains unclear why. We reasoned that characterizing the computations underlying visual comparisons between objects could explain the privileged status of certain qualitatively special views. We measured pose discrimination for a wide range of objects, finding large variations in performance depending on the object and the viewing angle, with front and back views yielding particularly good discrimination. Strikingly, a simple and biologically plausible computational model based on measuring the projected three-dimensional optical flow between views of objects accurately predicted both successes and failures of discrimination performance. This provides a computational account of why certain views have a privileged status.

Funder

European Research Council

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Hessisches Ministerium für Wissenschaft und Kunst

Publisher

The Royal Society

Reference48 articles.

1. Palmer S , Rosch E , Chase P . 1981 Canonical perspective and the perception of objects. In Attention and performance IX (eds J Long , A Baddeley ), pp. 135–151. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

2. What Object Attributes Determine Canonical Views?

3. Typical viewpoints of objects are better detected than atypical ones

4. Canonical views in object representation and recognition

5. Memory for objects in canonical and noncanonical viewpoints

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3