Title, abstract and keywords: a practical guide to maximize the visibility and impact of academic papers

Author:

Pottier Patrice12ORCID,Lagisz Malgorzata13ORCID,Burke Samantha1ORCID,Drobniak Szymon M.14ORCID,Downing Philip A.5ORCID,Macartney Erin L.16ORCID,Martinig April Robin1ORCID,Mizuno Ayumi17ORCID,Morrison Kyle1ORCID,Pollo Pietro1ORCID,Ricolfi Lorenzo1ORCID,Tam Jesse18ORCID,Williams Coralie1ORCID,Yang Yefeng1ORCID,Nakagawa Shinichi13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Evolution & Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

2. Division of Ecology and Evolution, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia

3. Theoretical Sciences Visiting Program, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Onna 904-0495, Japan

4. Institute of Environmental Sciences, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland

5. Ecology and Genetics Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland

6. School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

7. Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan

8. Centre for Ecosystem Science, School of Biology, Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Abstract

In a growing digital landscape, enhancing the discoverability and resonance of scientific articles is essential. Here, we offer 10 recommendations to amplify the discoverability of studies in search engines and databases. Particularly, we argue that the strategic use and placement of key terms in the title, abstract and keyword sections can boost indexing and appeal. By surveying 230 journals in ecology and evolutionary biology, we found that current author guidelines may unintentionally limit article findability. Our survey of 5323 studies revealed that authors frequently exhaust abstract word limits—particularly those capped under 250 words. This suggests that current guidelines may be overly restrictive and not optimized to increase the dissemination and discoverability of digital publications. Additionally, 92% of studies used redundant keywords in the title or abstract, undermining optimal indexing in databases. We encourage adopting structured abstracts to maximize the incorporation of key terms in titles, abstracts and keywords. In addition, we encourage the relaxation of abstract and keyword limitations in journals with strict guidelines, and the inclusion of multilingual abstracts to broaden global accessibility. These recommendations to editors are designed to improve article engagement and facilitate evidence synthesis, thereby aligning scientific publishing with the modern needs of academic research.

Publisher

The Royal Society

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3