Abstract
A new method for the estimation of the parameters in the allometric equation is described whereby both the estimates and their standard errors are determined in a simple manner. The fitting of curves to biological data is discussed, and the lack of equivalence between a form containing exponential parameters and its logarithmic tranformation shown. The classical method is extended to apply to this situation. The Dubois-Lapicque-Brummelkamp theory is discussed in the light of this work and shown to be untenable. In particular, there is no basis for the view that, if the form
y
=
bx
α
is fitted to the brain and body weights of vertebrates, the interspecific value of
α
is 5/9 and its intraspecific value is 0·26. A final maximum brain weight is demonstrated for some species which is independent of the adult body weight. The analysis of mental development in terms of 'cephalization constants’ is not in accordance with the facts, and a much deeper analysis of the comparative anatomy involved must be made if a quantitative study of the ontogenetic and phylogenetic development of the brain is to be achieved.
Reference26 articles.
1. Brain-Weight and Body-Weight of Mammals
2. Brummelkamp R. 1939 Acta Ned. M orph. 2 188 260 268.
3. A nn;Count E.;N.Y. Acad. Sci. 46, art.,1947
4. de Beer G. R. 1940 Article. `Em bryology and ta x o n o m y ' in The N ew Systematica edited by J. H uxley. Oxford.
5. Dubois E. 1897 Bull. Soc. Anthrop. P a ris 8 (Ser. iv) 337.
Cited by
47 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献