Modelling marine protected areas: insights and hurdles

Author:

Fulton Elizabeth A.12,Bax Nicholas J.13,Bustamante Rodrigo H.4ORCID,Dambacher Jeffrey M.52,Dichmont Catherine4,Dunstan Piers K.1,Hayes Keith R.5,Hobday Alistair J.12,Pitcher Roland4,Plagányi Éva E.4ORCID,Punt André E.16,Savina-Rolland Marie7,Smith Anthony D. M.12,Smith David C.12

Affiliation:

1. CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, GPO Box 1538, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia

2. Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, 20 Castray Esplanade, Battery Point, Tasmania 7004, Australia

3. Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, 20 Castray Esplanade, Battery Point, Tasmania 7004, Australia

4. CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, PO Box 2583, Brisbane, Queensland 4001, Australia

5. CSIRO Digital Productivity, GPO Box 1538, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia

6. School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Box 355020, Seattle, WA 98195-5020, USA

7. Laboratoire Ressources Halieutiques, Centre Manche - Mer du Nord, 150, quai Gambetta, BP 699, 62321 Boulogne sur Mer Cedex, France

Abstract

Models provide useful insights into conservation and resource management issues and solutions. Their use to date has highlighted conditions under which no-take marine protected areas (MPAs) may help us to achieve the goals of ecosystem-based management by reducing pressures, and where they might fail to achieve desired goals. For example, static reserve designs are unlikely to achieve desired objectives when applied to mobile species or when compromised by climate-related ecosystem restructuring and range shifts. Modelling tools allow planners to explore a range of options, such as basing MPAs on the presence of dynamic oceanic features, and to evaluate the potential future impacts of alternative interventions compared with ‘no-action’ counterfactuals, under a range of environmental and development scenarios. The modelling environment allows the analyst to test if indicators and management strategies are robust to uncertainties in how the ecosystem (and the broader human–ecosystem combination) operates, including the direct and indirect ecological effects of protection. Moreover, modelling results can be presented at multiple spatial and temporal scales, and relative to ecological, economic and social objectives. This helps to reveal potential ‘surprises', such as regime shifts, trophic cascades and bottlenecks in human responses. Using illustrative examples, this paper briefly covers the history of the use of simulation models for evaluating MPA options, and discusses their utility and limitations for informing protected area management in the marine realm.

Publisher

The Royal Society

Subject

General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3