Self-organization in Slovenian public spending

Author:

Joksimović Jelena1ORCID,Perc Matjaž23456ORCID,Levnajić Zoran1

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Information Sciences in Novo Mesto, Ljubljanska cesta 31A, Novo Mesto 8000, Slovenia

2. Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, University of Maribor, Koroška cesta 160, Maribor 2000, Slovenia

3. Department of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung 404332, Taiwan

4. Alma Mater Europaea, Slovenska Ulica 17, Maribor 2000, Slovenia

5. Complexity Science Hub Vienna, Josefstädterstrasse 39, Vienna 1080, Austria

6. Department of Physics, Kyung Hee University, 26 Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Abstract

Private businesses are often entrusted with public contracts, wherein public money is allocated to a private company. This process raises concerns about transparency, even in the most developed democracies. But are there any regularities guiding this process? Do all private companies benefit equally from the state budgets? Here, we tackle these questions focusing on the case of Slovenia, which keeps excellent records of this kind of public spending. We examine a dataset detailing every transfer of public money to the private sector from January 2003 to May 2020. During this time, Slovenia has conducted business with no less than 248 989 private companies. We find that the cumulative distribution of money received per company can be reasonably well explained by a power-law or lognormal fit. We also show evidence for the first-mover advantage, and determine that companies receive new funding in a way that is roughly linear over time. These results indicate that, despite all human factors involved, Slovenian public spending is at least to some extent regulated by emergent self-organizing principles.

Funder

Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS

Publisher

The Royal Society

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference50 articles.

1. Allocating Public Spending Efficiently: Is There a Need for a Better Mechanism to Inform Decisions in the UK and Elsewhere?

2. How Nature Works

3. Rigney D. 2013 The Matthew effect: how advantage begets further advantage. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

4. The Matthew effect in empirical data

5. Schumpeter JA. 1934 The theory of economic development. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3