Prevalence, patterns and predictors of paranormal beliefs in The Netherlands: a several-analysts approach

Author:

Hoogeveen S.1,Borsboom D.2,Kucharský Š.2,Marsman M.2,Molenaar D.2,de Ron J.2,Sekulovski N.2,Visser I.2,van Elk M.3,Wagenmakers E.-J.2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Methodology and Statistics, Utrecht University , Utrecht, The Netherlands

2. Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam, The Netherlands

3. Institute of Psychology, Leiden University , Leiden, The Netherlands

Abstract

Paranormal beliefs encompass a wide variety of phenomena, including the existence of supernatural entities such as ghosts and witches, as well as extraordinary human abilities such as telepathy and clairvoyance. In the current study, we used a nationally representative sample ( N = 2534 ) to investigate the presence and correlates of paranormal beliefs among the secular Dutch population. The results indicated that most single paranormal phenomena (e.g. belief in clairvoyance) are endorsed by 10–20% of Dutch respondents; however, 55.6% of respondents qualify as paranormal believers based on the preregistered criterion that they believe in at least one phenomenon with considerable certainty. In addition, we invited four analysis teams with different methodological expertise to assess the structure of paranormal beliefs using traditional factor analysis, network analysis, Bayesian network analysis and latent class analysis (LCA). The teams’ analyses indicated adequate fit of a four-factor structure reported in a 1985 study, but also emphasized different conclusions across techniques; network analyses showed evidence against strong connectedness within most clusters, and suggested a five-cluster structure. The application of various analytic techniques painted a nuanced picture of paranormal beliefs and believers in The Netherlands and suggests that despite increased secularization, subgroups of the general population still believe in paranormal phenomena.

Publisher

The Royal Society

Reference130 articles.

1. I.—COMPUTING MACHINERY AND INTELLIGENCE

2. Oppy G , Dowe D . 2016 The Turing test. (ed. EN Zalta ). The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. See https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/turing-test/.

3. Wagenmakers EJ , Wetzels R , Borsboom D , Kievit R , van der HLJ . 2015 A skeptical eye on psi. In Extrasensory perception: support, skepticism, and science (eds E May , S Marwaha ), pp. 153–176. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.

4. Bosveld J . 2010 Isaac Newton world's most famous alchemist. Discover Magazine. See https://www.discovermagazine.com/the-sciences/isaac-newton-worlds-most-famous-alchemist.

5. Voss D . 2014 This month in physics history. March 1880: the Curie brothers discover piezoelectricity. See https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/201403/physicshistory.cfm

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3