Requirements for the formal representation of pathophysiology mechanisms by clinicians

Author:

de Bono B.12ORCID,Helvensteijn M.3,Kokash N.3,Martorelli I.3,Sarwar D.1,Islam S.4,Grenon P.2,Hunter P.15

Affiliation:

1. Auckland Bioengineering Institute (ABI), University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

2. Farr Institute, University College London, 222 Euston Road, London, UK

3. Leiden Institute of Advanced Computer Science, University of Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands

4. University of East London, University Way, London, UK

5. Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics (DPAG), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Abstract

Knowledge of multiscale mechanisms in pathophysiology is the bedrock of clinical practice. If quantitative methods, predicting patient-specific behaviour of these pathophysiology mechanisms, are to be brought to bear on clinical decision-making, the Human Physiome community and Clinical community must share a common computational blueprint for pathophysiology mechanisms. A number of obstacles stand in the way of this sharing—not least the technical and operational challenges that must be overcome to ensure that (i) the explicit biological meanings of the Physiome's quantitative methods to represent mechanisms are open to articulation, verification and study by clinicians, and that (ii) clinicians are given the tools and training to explicitly express disease manifestations in direct contribution to modelling. To this end, the Physiome and Clinical communities must co-develop a common computational toolkit, based on this blueprint, to bridge the representation of knowledge of pathophysiology mechanisms (a) that is implicitly depicted in electronic health records and the literature, with (b) that found in mathematical models explicitly describing mechanisms. In particular, this paper makes use of a step-wise description of a specific disease mechanism as a means to elicit the requirements of representing pathophysiological meaning explicitly. The computational blueprint developed from these requirements addresses the Clinical community goals to (i) organize and manage healthcare resources in terms of relevant disease-related knowledge of mechanisms and (ii) train the next generation of physicians in the application of quantitative methods relevant to their research and practice.

Funder

Seventh Framework Programme

Innovative Medicines Initiative

Publisher

The Royal Society

Subject

Biomedical Engineering,Biomaterials,Biochemistry,Bioengineering,Biophysics,Biotechnology

Reference36 articles.

1. Using CellML with OpenCMISS to simulate multi-scale physiology;Nickerson DP;Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol,2014

2. Supporting SBML as a Model Exchange Format in Software Applications

3. A Stochastic Polygons Model for Glandular Structures in Colon Histology Images

4. The Cardiac Atlas Project—an imaging database for computational modeling and statistical atlases of the heart

5. How to organize for a large-scale openEHR-based Electronic Patient Record;Ulriksen G-H;Stud. Health Technol. Inform,2015

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3