The Ferrier Lecture: The nature of central inhibition

Abstract

I feel greatly honoured by the invitation to give the Ferrier Lecture. I attended the first Ferrier Lecture, given by Sherrington in 1929, and I learned from Sherrington to value and admire the pioneer contributions of David Ferrier to neurology. In choosing the subject of inhibition for my lecture I was prompted by the peculiar challenge that inhibition has presented to physiologists ever since it was first demonstrated by the Weber brothers in 1846 that stimulation of the vagus nerve could stop the heart and by Setchenov in 1863 that stimulation of areas in the brain could slow or prevent reflex responses of frog limbs. It was Sherrington who greatly extended and organized knowledge of inhibition in the central nervous system; first, by a series of remarkable investigations, and finally by a theoretical paper published by the Royal Society in 1925, in which excitation and inhibition were given equivalent status in the synaptic mechanisms controlling neuronal discharge. His interest in central inhibition continued to the end of his scientific life, and was the subject of his Nobel Lecture in 1932. I might mention that both my first scientific paper and my D.Phil. thesis were concerned with inhibition, and that I have continued to be more interested in the problem of synaptic inhibition than in any other aspect of neurophysiology. In recent years progress has been so rapid that our understanding of the nature of central inhibition is in several respects more complete than that of central excitation. This illumination has followed rather rapidly upon a long period of ingenious theorizing which is now only of historical interest