Affiliation:
1. Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
2. School of Mathematics, University of Edinburgh, James Clerk Maxwell Building, Mayfield Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JZ, UK
Abstract
We review connections between phase transitions in high-dimensional combinatorial geometry and phase transitions occurring in modern high-dimensional data analysis and signal processing. In data analysis, such transitions arise as abrupt breakdown of linear model selection, robust data fitting or compressed sensing reconstructions, when the complexity of the model or the number of outliers increases beyond a threshold. In combinatorial geometry, these transitions appear as abrupt changes in the properties of face counts of convex polytopes when the dimensions are varied. The thresholds in these very different problems appear in the same critical locations after appropriate calibration of variables. These thresholds are important in each subject area: for linear modelling, they place hard limits on the degree to which the now ubiquitous high-throughput data analysis can be successful; for robustness, they place hard limits on the degree to which standard robust fitting methods can tolerate outliers before breaking down; for compressed sensing, they define the sharp boundary of the undersampling/sparsity trade-off curve in undersampling theorems. Existing derivations of phase transitions in combinatorial geometry assume that the underlying matrices have independent and identically distributed Gaussian elements. In applications, however, it often seems that Gaussianity is not required. We conducted an extensive computational experiment and formal inferential analysis to test the hypothesis that these phase transitions are
universal
across a range of underlying matrix ensembles. We ran millions of linear programs using random matrices spanning several matrix ensembles and problem sizes; visually, the empirical phase transitions do not depend on the ensemble, and they agree extremely well with the asymptotic theory assuming Gaussianity. Careful statistical analysis reveals discrepancies that can be explained as transient terms, decaying with problem size. The experimental results are thus consistent with an asymptotic large-
n
universality across matrix ensembles; finite-sample universality can be rejected.
Subject
General Physics and Astronomy,General Engineering,General Mathematics
Reference12 articles.
1. Adamczak R. Litvak A. E. Pajor A.& Tomczak-Jaegermann N.. 2009 Compressed sensing matrices with independent columns and neighborly polytopes by random sampling. (http://arxiv.org/abs/0904.4723).
2. Berinde R. Gilbert A. C. Indyk P. Karloff H.& Strauss M. J.. 2008 Combining geometry and combinatorics: a unified approach to sparse signal recovery. See http://front.math.ucdavis.edu/0804.4666.
3. High-Dimensional Centrally Symmetric Polytopes with Neighborliness Proportional to Dimension
4. Donoho D. L.. 2005b Neighborly polytopes and sparse solution of underdetermined linear equations. See http://www-stat.stanford.edu/~donoho/Reports/2005/NPaSSULE-01-28-05.pdf.
5. Feature selection by higher criticism thresholding achieves the optimal phase diagram
Cited by
276 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献