Affiliation:
1. Marine Sciences Research Center, State University of NewYork at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794-5000, USA
2. Center for Great Lakes Studies, University ofWisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee,WI 53208, USA
Abstract
Using laser optics to illuminate high–resolution video–recordings, we revealed behavioural mechanisms through which males of the calanoid copepod species
Temora longicornis
locate females. Males of
T. longicornis
swam at significantly faster speeds than females along more sinuous routes, possibly reflecting adaptations to increase encounter with females. Upon approaching within 2 mm (i.e. two bodylengths) of a female's swimming path, males accelerated to significantly higher pursuit speeds. Pursuit trajectories closely traced the trajectories of females, suggesting that males were following detectable trails created by swimming females. Males of
T. longicornis
detected female trails up to at least 10 s old, and tracked trails for distances exceeding 13 cm, or 130 bodylengths. Females were positioned up to 34.2 mm away from males (i.e. reactive distance) when males initiated ‘mate–tracking’. It was always the males of
T. longicornis
that detected and pursued mates. In rare events, males pursued other males. Behavioural flexibility was exhibited by males during mate–tracking. Males generally tracked the trails of ‘cruising’ (i.e. fast–swimming) females with high accuracy, while the pursuits of ‘hovering’ (i.e. slow–swimming) females often included ‘casting’ behaviour, in which males performed sharp turns in zigzag patterns within localized volumes. This casting by males suggested that hovering females create more dispersed trails than cruising females. Casting behaviour also was initiated by males near locations where females had hopped, suggesting that rapid movements by females disrupt the continuity of their trails. Males were inefficient at choosing initial tracking directions, following trails in the incorrect direction in 27 of the 67 (40%) mating pursuits observed. Males usually attempted to correct misguided pursuits by ‘back–tracking’ along trails in the correct direction. Males were observed to detect and track their own previous trajectories without females present, suggesting the possibility that males follow their own trails during back–tracking. Observations of males tracking their own trails and the trails of other males bring into question the specificity of trails as a mechanism promoting reproductive isolation among co–occurring planktonic copepods.
Subject
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Reference24 articles.
1. Population structure and swarm formation of the cyclopoid copepod Dioithona oculata near mangrove cays
2. Blades P. I. & Youngbluth M. J. 1980 Morphological physiological and behavioral aspects of mating in calanoid copepods. In Evolution and ecology of zooplankton communities (ed. W. C. Kerfoot) pp. 39^51. Hanover NH: University Press of New England.
3. Boxshall G. A. Yen J. & Strickler J. R. 1997 Functional signi¢- cance of the sexual dimorphism in the cephalic appendages of Euchaeta rimana Bradford. Bull. Mar. Sci. (In the press.)
4. Buskey E. J. 1984 Swimming pattern as an indicator of the roles of copepod sensory systems in the recognition of food. Mar. Biol. 79 165^175.
5. Seasonal contrasts in the diel vertical distribution, feeding behavior, and grazing impact of the copepod Temora longicornis in Long Island Sound
Cited by
127 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献