Affiliation:
1. Rothamsted Experimental StationHarpenden, Hertfordshire AL5 2JQUK
Abstract
The assessment of the soil resource of any region has two parts, namely, an inventory of the kinds of soil and their distribution, and knowledge of the way each kind can be used and its performance under a range of circumstances. Soil varies substantially and intricately over short distances in most parts of the world. Inventory by field survey and air–photo interpretation must be done at a local scale. Inventories may be combined so that an individual nation state or region of similar size can know what kinds of soil it has, how much and where they are, how much each can produce, how to manage each in perpetuity, and the risks of degradation in use. Local classifications, with classes defined simply and identifiably on aerial photographs, will serve for mapping, and in combination with classical statistics can provide sound estimates from stratified sampling and agronomic experimentation.
Sound assessment should also be at this local scale initially. This should combine fundamental understanding of the soil's behaviour, strategic agronomic research on regional stations, and on–farm trials. The last are crucial for estimating productivity of the soil in practice.
Data from all sources can be stored, sorted and displayed by geographic information systems that now have abundant capacity. They should be indexed by soil class and other attributes, with clear distinction being made between assessments of productive potential and basic data. They should be publicly accessible, to ensure that data are readily available and never lost.
Estimates of the soil resource and its productivity for large regions, nation states, and the world can be compiled from local surveys by sampling through a ‘bottom–up’ procedure.
Subject
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Reference53 articles.
1. Contribution of Landsat data (MSS) to soil survey: application to the soil of southwestern Sinai (Egypt)
2. Allan W. 1949 Studies in African land usage in ~orthern Rhodesia. Rhodes-Livingstone Papers No. 15. Cape Town : Oxford University Press.
3. Allan W. 1965 ~he African husbandman. Edinburgh : Oliver & Boyd.
4. Beckett P. H. T Webster R. McNeil G. M. & Mitchell C. W. 1972 Terrain evaluation by means of a data bank. Geogrl ~. 138 430-456.
5. Bourne R. 1931 Regional sur~e~ and its relation to stocktaking of the agricultural and forest resources of the British Empire. Oxford Forestry Memoirs No. 13. Oxford UK : Clarendon Press.
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献