Affiliation:
1. Department of Philosophy, University of California (Berkeley), Berkeley, CA 94720–2390, USA
Abstract
The neurosciences have advanced to the point that we can now treat consciousness as a scientific problem like any other. The problem is to explain how brain processes cause consciousness and how consciousness is realized in the brain. Progress is impeded by a number of philosophical mistakes, and the aim of this paper is to remove nine of those mistakes: (i) consciousness cannot be defined; (ii) consciousness is subjective but science is objective; (iii) brain processes cannot explain consciousness; (iv) the problem of ‘qualia’ should be set aside; (v) consciousness is epiphenomenal; (vi) consciousness has no evolutionary function; (vii) a causal account of consciousness is necessarily dualistic; (viii) science is reductionistic, so a scientific account of consciousness would show it reducible to something else; and (ix) an account of consciousness must be an information processing account.
Subject
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Reference7 articles.
1. Crick F. 1994 The astonishing hypothesis: the scienti¢c search for the soul. New York: Simon & Schuster.
2. Descartes R. 1984 The philosophical writings of Descartes vol. II (translated by J. Cottingham R. Stootho¡ & D. Murdoch). Cambridge University Press.
3. Edelman G. 1989 The remembered present: a biological theory of consciousness. New York: Basic Books.
4. What is it like to be a bat;Nagel T.;Philosoph. Rev.,1974
5. Searle J. R. 1980 Minds brains and programs. Behav. Brain Sci. 3 417^457.
Cited by
64 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献