Abstract
The hypothesis of locomotor mimicry in butterflies presented by Srygley (
Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond.
B 343, 145—155 (1994)) is criticized as unparsimonious, from two perspectives. First, the existence of mimicry between palatable but unprofitable prey is disputed on theoretical and empirical grounds. The lack of a strong predator aversion stimulus seriously undermines the unprofitable prey scenario, and supposed cases of mimicry of unprofitable models are explicable by traditional mimetic modes. Second, correlations of phenotypic characters used to support alternative adaptive peaks for palatable and unpalatable butterflies are criticized for failing to account for phylogenetic relationships. Virtually all of the relevant variation in flight-related morphology is shown to be due to differences between clades, rather than mimicry groups. An alternative hypothesis emphasizing phylogenetic constraint in the evolution of morphological characters associated with predator avoidance is proposed. The ground rule — or perhaps
doctrine
would be a better term — is that adaptation is a special and onerous concept that should be used only where it is really necessary. When it must be recognized, it should be attributed to no higher a level of organization than is demanded by the evidence. In explaining adaptation, one should assume the adequacy of the simplest form of natural selection, that of alternate alleles in Mendelian populations, unless the evidence clearly shows that this theory does not suffice. G. C. Williams (1966, pp. 4—5).
Subject
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Reference133 articles.
1. Ackery P.R. 1984 Systematic and faunistic studies on butterflies. In The biology of butterflies (ed. R.I. Vane-Wright & P.R. Ackery) pp. 9-24. Princeton New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
2. Hostplants and classification: a review of nymphalid butterflies
3. Ackery P.R. & Vane-Wright R.I. 1984 Milkweed butterflies. London: British Museum of Natural History.
4. Pronophiline butterflies (Satyridae) of the three Andean Cordilleras of Colombia
5. Adelpha (Nymphalidae): Deception on the Wing
Cited by
33 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献