Regaining creativity in science: insights from conversation

Author:

Morgan Ruth M.12ORCID,Kneebone Roger L.34,Pyenson Nicholas D.56ORCID,Sholts Sabrina B.7ORCID,Houstoun Will4,Butler Benjamin8,Chesters Kevin9

Affiliation:

1. Department of Security and Crime Science and UCL Centre for the Forensic Sciences, University College London, 35 Tavistock Square, London, UK

2. The Arista Institute, UCL Engineering Front Building, Torrington Place, London WC1E 7JE, UK

3. Centre for Engagement and Simulation Science, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK

4. Royal College of Music–Imperial Centre for Performance Science, Royal College of Music, London, UK

5. Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC, USA

6. Department of Paleontology and Geology, Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture, Seattle, WA, USA

7. Department of Anthropology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA

8. Horasis, Maurerstrasse 2, 8500 Frauenfeld, Switzerland

9. Harbour Collective, LABS House, 15–19 Bloomsbury Way, Holborn, London WC1A 2TH, UK

Abstract

The ‘early modern’ (Renaissance) workshop was predicated on the idea that informal, open-ended cooperation enables participants to experience difference and develop new insights, which can lead to new ways of thinking and doing. This paper presents the insights that emerged from a conversation event that brought wide-ranging voices together from different domains in science, and across the arts and industry, to consider science leadership as we look to the future in a time of interlocking crises. The core theme identified was a need to regain creativity in science; in the methods of scientific endeavours, in the way science is produced and communicated, and in how science is experienced in society. Three key challenges for re-establishing a culture of creativity in science emerged: (i) how scientists communicate what science is and what it is for, (ii) what scientists value, and (iii) how scientists create and co-create science with and for society. Furthermore, the value of open-ended and ongoing conversation between different perspectives as a means of achieving this culture was identified and demonstrated.

Funder

UCL Dawes Centre for Future Crime

World Economic Forum

Publisher

The Royal Society

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Global research priorities for historical ecology to inform conservation;Endangered Species Research;2024-06-27

2. Forensic Science Innovation in the UK: Roadblocks and Enablers;Driving Forensic Innovation in the 21st Century;2024

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3