The fallacy of global comparisons based on per capita measures

Author:

Kratochvíl Lukáš1ORCID,Havlíček Jan2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7 , Prague 128 00, Czech Republic

2. Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7 , Prague 128 00, Czech Republic

Abstract

Media, social scientists and public health researchers often present comparisons across countries, and policy makers use such comparisons to take evidence-based action. For a meaningful comparison among countries, one often needs to normalize the measure for differences in population size. To address this issue, the first choice is usually to calculate per capita ratios. Such ratios, however, normalize the measure for differences in population size directly only under the highly restrictive assumption of a proportional increase of the measure with population size. Violation of this assumption frequently leads to misleading conclusions. We compare per capita ratios with an approach based on regression, a widely used statistical procedure that eliminates many of the problems with ratios and allows for straightforward data interpretation. It turns out that the per capita measures in three global datasets (gross domestic product, COVID-19-related mortality and CO 2 production) systematically overestimate values in countries with small populations, while countries with large populations tend to have misleadingly low per capita ratios owing to the large denominators. Unfortunately, despite their biases, comparisons based on per capita ratios are still ubiquitous, and they are used for influential recommendations by various global institutions. Their continued use can cause significant damage when employed as evidence for policy actions and should therefore be replaced by a more scientifically substantiated and informative method, such as a regression-based approach.

Publisher

The Royal Society

Reference44 articles.

1. IDNES.cz ČTK . 2020 Globální spotřeba piva v loňském roce vzrostla jedničkou zůstává Česko. See https://www.idnes.cz/ekonomika/zahranicni/globalni-spotreba-pivo-narust-ceska-republika-prumerna-spotreba-asie-afrika.A201223_153315_eko-zahranicni_misl (accessed 17 January 2024).

2. Novinky ČTK Aš . 2021 Nová statistika: Česko má nejvíc obětí koronaviru na obyvatele na světě. See https://www.novinky.cz/clanek/koronavirus-nova-statistika-cesko-ma-nejvic-obeti-koronaviru-na-obyvatele-na-svete-40356693 (accessed 17 January 2024).

3. ČTK . 2023 Životní úroveň v Česku se mírně snížila oproti Evropské unii. Před zeměmi Visegrádu ale vede. See https://www.irozhlas.cz/ekonomika/zivotni-uroven-cesko-srovnani-eu-statisticka-rocenka_2311271150_kac (accessed 17 January 2024).

4. Saslow E . 2018 Gun violence’s distant echo. See https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/national/wp/2018/05/18/feature/a-teenager-wanted-to-talk-about-gun-control-would-anyone-in-her-town-listen/ (accessed 17 January 2024).

5. Shryock T Payerchin R . 2023 Doctor salaries under fire after Washington Post report. See https://www.medicaleconomics.com/view/doctor-salaries-under-fire-after-washington-post-report (accessed 17 January 2024).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3