Algorithmic accountability

Author:

Shah Hetan12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Royal Statistical Society, London, UK

2. Policy Institute, King's College London, London, UK

Abstract

There is enormous opportunity for positive social impact from the rise of algorithms and machine learning. But this requires a licence to operate from the public, based on trustworthiness. There are a range of concerns relating to how algorithms might be held to account in areas affecting the public sphere. This paper outlines a number of approaches including greater transparency, monitoring of outcomes and improved governance. It makes a case that public sector bodies that hold datasets should be more confident in negotiating terms with the private sector. It also argues that all regulators (not just data regulators) need to wake up to the challenges posed by changing technology. Other improvements include diversity of the workforce, ethics training, codes of conduct for data scientists, and new deliberative bodies. Even if these narrower issues are solved, the paper poses some wider concerns including data monopolies, the challenge to democracy, public participation and maintaining the public interest. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue ‘The growing ubiquity of algorithms in society: implications, impacts and innovations’.

Publisher

The Royal Society

Subject

General Physics and Astronomy,General Engineering,General Mathematics

Reference27 articles.

1. Independent Expert Advisory Group on a Data Revolution for Sustainable Development. 2014 A World That Counts. See http://www.undatarevolution.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/A-World-That-Counts.pdf.

2. Harwich E Laycock K. 2018 Thinking on its Own—AI in the NHS. (Reform). See http://www.reform.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/AI-in-Healthcare-report_.pdf.

3. Mulgan G. 2018 A roadmap for AI: 10 ways governments will change (and what they risk getting wrong). (Nesta). See https:// www.nesta.org.uk/blog/roadmap-ai-10-ways-governments-will-change-and-what-they-risk-getting-wrong.

4. Taylor M. 2017 Citizens not algorithms must shape progress. See https://www.thersa.org/discover/publications-and-articles/matthew-taylor-blog/2017/09/citizens-tech-change-algorithms-progress.

5. BBC News Magazine. 2012 A Point of View: Which comes first—trust or trustworthiness? See http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-20627410.

Cited by 37 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3