Identifying key socioecological factors influencing the expression of egalitarianism and inequality among foragers

Author:

Wilson Kurt M.123ORCID,Cole Kasey E.42,Codding Brian F.4235ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Geography, University of Utah, Salt Lake City 84112 UT, USA

2. University of Utah Archaeological Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City 84112 UT, USA

3. Global Change and Sustainability Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City 84112 UT, USA

4. Department of Anthropology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City 84112 UT, USA

5. Environmental and Sustainability Studies, University of Utah, Salt Lake City 84112 UT, USA

Abstract

Understanding how resource characteristics influence variability in social and material inequality among foraging populations is a prominent area of research. However, obtaining cross-comparative data from which to evaluate theoretically informed resource characteristic factors has proved difficult, particularly for investigating interactions of characteristics. Therefore, we develop an agent-based model to evaluate how five key characteristics of primary resources (predictability, heterogeneity, abundance, economy of scale and monopolizability) structure pay-offs and explore how they interact to favour both egalitarianism and inequality. Using iterated simulations from 243 unique combinations of resource characteristics analysed with an ensemble machine-learning approach, we find the predictability and heterogeneity of key resources have the greatest influence on selection for egalitarian and nonegalitarian outcomes. These results help explain the prevalence of egalitarianism among foraging populations, as many groups probably relied on resources that were both relatively less predictable and more homogeneously distributed. The results also help explain rare forager inequality, as comparison with ethnographic and archaeological examples suggests the instances of inequality track strongly with reliance on resources that were predictable and heterogeneously distributed. Future work quantifying comparable measures of these two variables, in particular, may be able to identify additional instances of forager inequality. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Evolutionary ecology of inequality’.

Funder

National Science Foundation

Publisher

The Royal Society

Subject

General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Reference100 articles.

1. Human Territoriality: An Ecological Reassessment

2. Service ER. 1962 Primitive social organization. An evolutionary perspective, 1st edn. New York, NY: Random House.

3. Sack RD. 1986 Human territoriality: its theory and history. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

4. Gains to cooperation drive the evolution of egalitarianism

5. The evolution of inequality

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Toward an evolutionary ecology of (in)equality;Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences;2023-06-26

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3