Cross-species parallels in babbling: animals and algorithms

Author:

ter Haar Sita M.1ORCID,Fernandez Ahana A.2ORCID,Gratier Maya3,Knörnschild Mirjam245ORCID,Levelt Claartje67ORCID,Moore Roger K.8ORCID,Vellema Michiel1ORCID,Wang Xiaoqin9ORCID,Oller D. Kimbrough101112ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Cognitive Neurobiology and Helmholtz Institute, Department of Psychology, Utrecht University, PO Box 80086, 3508 TB Utrecht, The Netherlands

2. Museum für Naturkunde - Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Invalidenstrasse 43, 10115 Berlin, Germany

3. Laboratoire Ethologie, Cognition, Développement, Paris Nanterre University, Nanterre, France

4. Animal Behavior Lab, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany

5. Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Ancón, Panama

6. Leiden University Centre for Linguistics, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands

7. Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands

8. Department Computer Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

9. Laboratory of Auditory Neurophysiology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA

10. School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA

11. Institute for Intelligent Systems, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA

12. Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research, Klosterneuburg, Austria

Abstract

A key feature of vocal ontogeny in a variety of taxa with extensive vocal repertoires is a developmental pattern in which vocal exploration is followed by a period of category formation that results in a mature species-specific repertoire. Vocal development preceding the adult repertoire is often called ‘babbling’, a term used to describe aspects of vocal development in species of vocal-learning birds, some marine mammals, some New World monkeys, some bats and humans. The paper summarizes the results of research on babbling in examples from five taxa and proposes a unifying definition facilitating their comparison. There are notable similarities across these species in the developmental pattern of vocalizations, suggesting that vocal production learning might require babbling. However, the current state of the literature is insufficient to confirm this suggestion. We suggest directions for future research to elucidate this issue, emphasizing the importance of (i) expanding the descriptive data and seeking species with complex mature repertoires where babbling may not occur or may occur only to a minimal extent; (ii) (quasi-)experimental research to tease apart possible mechanisms of acquisition and/or self-organizing development; and (iii) computational modelling as a methodology to test hypotheses about the origins and functions of babbling. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Vocal learning in animals and humans’.

Funder

National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders of the National Institutes of Health

H2020 European Research Council

Dutch Research Council

Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture, and Science and the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research

Publisher

The Royal Society

Subject

General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3