Building bridges between natural and social science disciplines: a standardized methodology to combine data on ecosystem quality trends

Author:

Richter I.12ORCID,Roberts B. R.3,Sailley S. F.4,Sullivan E.4ORCID,Cheung V. V.5,Eales J.3,Fortnam M.6,Jontila J. B.7ORCID,Maharja C.8,Nguyen T. Ha.9,Pahl S.110,Praptiwi R. A.811,Sugardjito J.8,Sumeldan J. D. C.7,Syazwan W. M.1213ORCID,Then A. Y.14,Austen M. C.5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon, UK

2. Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Trøndelag, Norway

3. European Centre for Environment and Human Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK

4. Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, Devon, UK

5. School of Biological and Marine Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon, UK

6. Department of Geography, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK

7. College of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Western Philippines University, Puerto Princesa, Palawan, the Philippines

8. Centre for Sustainable Energy and Resources Management, Universitas Nasional, Jakarta, Indonesia

9. Faculty of Social Work, Hanoi National University of Education, Hanoi, Vietnam

10. Urban and Environmental Psychology Group, University of Vienna, 1010 Vienna, Austria

11. Department of Biotechnology, Universitas Esa Unggul, Jakarta, Indonesia

12. Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Built Environment, Universitas Esa Unggul, Jakarta, Indonesia

13. Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

14. Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Abstract

Despite a growing interest in interdisciplinary research, systematic ways of how to integrate data from different disciplines are still scarce. We argue that successful resource management relies on two key data sources: natural science data, which represents ecosystem structure and processes, and social science data, which describes people's perceptions and understanding. Both are vital, mutually complementing information sources that can underpin the development of feasible and effective policies and management interventions. To harvest the added value of combined knowledge, a uniform scaling system is needed. In this paper, we propose a standardized methodology to connect and explore different types of quantitative data from the natural and social sciences reflecting temporal trends in ecosystem quality. We demonstrate this methodology with different types of data such as fisheries stocks and mangrove cover on the one hand and community's perceptions on the other. The example data are collected from three United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) Biosphere reserves and one marine park in Southeast Asia. To easily identify patterns of convergence or divergence among the datasets, we propose heat maps using colour codes and icons for language- and education-independent understandability. Finally, we discuss the limitations as well as potential implications for resource management and the accompanying communication strategies.This article is part of the theme issue ‘Nurturing resilient marine ecosystems’.

Funder

Global Challenges Research Fund

Publisher

The Royal Society

Subject

General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3