Social information use and social information waste

Author:

Morin Olivier12ORCID,Jacquet Pierre Olivier3,Vaesen Krist4,Acerbi Alberto5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institut Jean Nicod, DEC, ENS, EHESS, CNRS, PSL University, UMR 8129, Paris, France

2. Minds and Traditions Research Group, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany

3. Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives et Computationnelles (LNC2), Département d'Etudes Cognitives, INSERM, Ecole Normale Supérieure, PSL Research University, Paris, France

4. School of Innovation Sciences, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

5. Centre for Culture and Evolution, Brunel University London, London, UK

Abstract

Social information is immensely valuable. Yet we waste it. The information we get from observing other humans and from communicating with them is a cheap and reliable informational resource. It is considered the backbone of human cultural evolution. Theories and models focused on the evolution of social learning show the great adaptive benefits of evolving cognitive tools to process it. In spite of this, human adults in the experimental literature use social information quite inefficiently: they do not take it sufficiently into account. A comprehensive review of the literature on five experimental tasks documented 45 studies showing social information waste, and four studies showing social information being over-used. These studies cover ‘egocentric discounting’ phenomena as studied by social psychology, but also include experimental social learning studies. Social information waste means that human adults fail to give social information its optimal weight. Both proximal explanations and accounts derived from evolutionary theory leave crucial aspects of the phenomenon unaccounted for: egocentric discounting is a pervasive effect that no single unifying explanation fully captures. Cultural evolutionary theory's insistence on the power and benefits of social influence is to be balanced against this phenomenon. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Foundations of cultural evolution’.

Funder

ANR

Publisher

The Royal Society

Subject

General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Reference90 articles.

Cited by 24 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Earlier social information has a stronger influence on judgments;Scientific Reports;2024-01-02

2. Investigating the effects of social information on spite in an online game;Evolutionary Human Sciences;2024

3. Enhancing human-AI collaboration: The case of colonoscopy;Digestive and Liver Disease;2023-11

4. Algorithm-mediated social learning in online social networks;Trends in Cognitive Sciences;2023-10

5. Insight in the Conspiracist’s Mind;Personality and Social Psychology Review;2023-09-30

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3