Who cares for women with children? Crossing the bridge between disciplines

Author:

Emmott Emily H.1ORCID,Myers Sarah12ORCID,Page Abigail E.3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. UCL Anthropology, University College London, 14 Taviton Street, London WC1H 0BW, UK

2. BirthRites Independent Max Planck Research Group, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany

3. Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK

Abstract

It has long been acknowledged that women with children require social support to promote their health and wellbeing, as well as that of their children. However, the dominant conceptualizations of support have been heavily influenced by Western family norms. The consequence, at best, has been to stifle our understanding of the nature and consequences of support for mothers and children. At worst, it has led to systematic discrimination negatively impacting maternal–child health. To fully engage with the complexities of social support, we must take multidisciplinary or interdisciplinary approaches spanning diverse cultural and geographical perspectives. However, multidisciplinary knowledge-processing can be challenging, and it is often unclear how different studies from different disciplines relate. To address this, we outline two epistemological frameworks—the scientific approach and Tinbergen's four questions—that can be useful tools in connecting research across disciplines. In this theme issue on ‘Multidisciplinary perspectives on social support and maternal–child health’, we attempt to foster multidisciplinary thinking by presenting work from a diverse range of disciplines, populations and cultures. Our hope is that these tools, along with papers in this issue, help to build a holistic understanding of social support and its consequences for mothers and their children. Overall, a multidisciplinary perspective points to how the responsibility of childrearing should not fall solely onto mothers. Indeed, this multidisciplinary issue demonstrates that successful childrearing is consistently an activity shared beyond the mother and the nuclear family: an insight that is crucial to harnessing the potential of social support to improve maternal–child health. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Multidisciplinary perspectives on social support and maternal–child health’.

Funder

Medical Research Council

Publisher

The Royal Society

Subject

General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Reference62 articles.

1. Myers S Emmott EH. 2021 Communication across maternal social networks during the UK's national lockdown and its association with postnatal depressive symptoms. OSF Preprints . (doi:10.31219/osf.io/cb85t)

2. Calarco JM Anderson E Meanwell E Knopf A. 2020 ‘Let's not pretend it's fun’: how COVID-19-related school and childcare closures are damaging mothers’ well-being. OSF Preprints . (doi:10.31235/osf.io/jyvk4)

3. Moms Are Not OK: COVID-19 and Maternal Mental Health

4. Women’s and men’s work, housework and childcare, before and during COVID-19

5. Rapid Systematic Review: The Impact of Social Isolation and Loneliness on the Mental Health of Children and Adolescents in the Context of COVID-19

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3